https://wildforkfoodsdev.myshopify.com/
The usability testing focuses on the evaluation of key elements of Wild Fork’s online experience including website and mobile experience. The research of findings would help WildFork Foods to achieve its business goals of increasing sales and brand building by providing effective strategies and solutions. The test session was conducted in English.
The research objectives are as follow:
1. Discover any issues with the user experience
2. Gather feedback on Brand impression and understanding of creative concepts, provide valid improvement strategies.
3. Assess whether the information architecture good for the user to find what they want, and how to improve it.
4. Test the usability of "Delivery" and "In-store pick-up" service options, including the function, Design and contents. Gather feedback to improve these service.
5. Find out what issues prevent user being engaged and making the purchase decision, provides the valid solutions to issues.
6. Gather feedback about the whole purchase path to make it more clear, easy to use, and reduce the abundance rate.
7. Gather feedback on various contents, especially product information and creative concepts.
8. Gather feedback on mobile experience, increase the consistency between mobile and desktop
9. Provide a clear decision on the following areas of visual design:
- what should be displayed in the fold of Home page
- The positions of call-to-action elements
- The visual hierarchy
- Responsive design pattern
- web/mobile style matches the brand logo
Usability Testing of Wild Fork Foods was facilitated on April 16, 2018 in one-on-one moderated sessions at the George Brown St. James Campus. The 45-minute testing sessions with 3 participants included 7 tasks, including 6 tasks of website and 1 task of mobile. All the data and feedback were from 3 participants during the test sessions. The test areas mainly focus on brand concepts, home delivery, In-store pick-up, purchase path and mobile-desktop consistency. The issues would be measured by a severity rating system includes critical, major, medium, minor and bug, which were related to priorities of problem-solving. According to the findings, we provided valid solutions and suggestions for improvement. The test session was conducted at School of Design in George Brown College. The website evaluation was conducted on a computer running Mac OS, and viewed at a 2560x1440 pixel screen resolution using the Chrome browser. The mobile prototype evaluation was conducted on an iPhone using a safari browser. Each participant took the task independently in a room, the test session was recorded by video.
We recruit 3 participants who were screened for criteria provided below for our usability test session. During the session, participants were asked to perform a few tasks on the website and mobile and the moderator asked participants related questions and feedback. All participants got CAD$100 as an incentive after completing the session.
Participant Feedback Highlights
According to the response and feedback from three participants, we found that users were able to complete most of the tasks, it was easy to explore information and concepts. However, when given some specific purchase tasks, they showed confusion and even not sure they completed or not. It’s easy to find out the brand concept, but it’s not impressive enough as users expected more visual content to explain. It’s easy to find out what products the website was selling, but the user didn’t notice other categories. In addition, the critical and most major issues happened at the purchase/ checkout path, which was an important part of an online shopping website. The core issue stopped user purchasing was the chaos of product info(i.e. weight, price, unit, etc) and limited options for delivery.
On the other hand, participants gave some positive feedback about the imagery, impression and mobile experience. There are two possible reasons why user liked the mobile experience, one is that users had more online shopping experience with the mobile device. Another is that the mobile design is consistent with the desktop which made it easier to use.
27 issues in total- [1] critical, [5] major, [12] medium, [9] minor
Rating system:
You want to feed your family right; and are always looking for higher quality products, especially meat and produce. You’ve heard that a new store called Wild Fork Foods prides themselves on high-quality meat at low prices. You’d like to learn more about what sets them apart, so you visit the Wild Fork website.
Exploration, Concepts ( Start from home page)
All of the users thought the task easy, one user rated (1) and two users rated (2).
You recently heard about a new meat shop called Wild Fork Foods from a friend. You’re curious to know if they deliver to your home since it’s a little hectic sometimes to do your shopping with the family. Visit the Wild Fork website to find out.
Home Delivery understanding
Most of the users found the task was difficult, one user rated (5) and two users rated (4).
You’re at Loblaws, trying to find everything on your list, but are very unimpressed by their meat selection. You decide that you’re going to buy your meat from Wild Fork instead, but want to see if it’s possible to order now and pick it up on your way home
In-store pickup understanding
Most of the users found the task was very easy, all users rate (1) for this task
You have a big family dinner this Sunday and are tired of the usual lasagna. You decide that THIS Sunday dinner is going to be steak night! Go to the Wild Fork website and buy enough steaks for your extended family of 10.
You’re in charge of picking up something for dinner tonight and are in the mood for pork. On the Wild Fork website, buy enough for the whole family.
Purchase path and experience, category purchase
Task 4:
The rates of task 4 varied from user to user. One user rated (1) easy, one rated (3) and one rated (5) difficult. For the user who rated this task easy, he still wasn’t clear how much quantity of steak he would need for his family of 10.
Task 5:
The rates of task 5 varied from user to user. One user rated (1) easy, one rated (3) and one rated (5) difficult. User liked the cart saver when he ended the checkout and continued shopping, which made the task become easier.
While browsing the Wild Fork website, you can’t help but notice the “Frozen is Fresher” statement displayed in a few places. You’re curious about this concept and want to understand what it means.
Concept exploration, brand building
All users found this task easy, rated between 1 and 2, however, they thought WF could improve its concept to be more impressive
Respondents browsed the Wild Fork website with mobile and get their general impressions.
Mobile experience, consistency between mobile and desktop
All users found mobile interface was consistent with the desktop, and it’s easy to use. Some user preferred the mobile version more the desktop because it was easy to notice scrolling capabilities, and thought mobile is more convenient for online shopping. Users noticed frozen meats were products WildFork sold, but only knew about limited ranges of products.
To recap, the usability testing of WildFork Foods online shopping experience went well, these finding and solutions will be helpful to achieve the research objectives and ongoing improvement. As the users expected more visual content of the brand and clear purchase info, some consideration should be given to these areas for the next steps.
Increase the brand awareness of WildFork Foods by visualizing the creative concepts and unique benefits. Develop a variety of visual contents to make the concepts standout of the website. Conduct test which focuses on brand understanding, find out more useful ideas for brand building
As some users faced difficulty to understand the product and go checkout process, it is necessary to reorganize the product content, including figure, description, imagery, and cost. Make sure all contents are understandable and readable, remove the information and options which make user confused.
Good service would be a key to make user make a final purchase action, so it’s important to provide a flexible service option to satisfy different user needs. For example, offering flexible time options for delivery and nearest store suggestion for pick-up.
As some function of the website were not active, some issues were not detected. A usability test for a completed version should be conducted in an early future, the earlier, the better.